So I have a theory- Creating The Psychology of Originality | Part 2
Why This Theory Could Only Have Come Through Me
For a long time, I believed my work was about helping women express themselves.
Helping them find the words.
Helping them shape their message.
Helping them show up with more confidence, clarity, and creativity online.
But this entry isn’t about what I thought my work was.
It’s about the moment I realised what I had actually been doing all along.
The Question That Changed Everything
When I finally named The Psychology of Originality, one question hit me harder than the breakthrough itself:
Why has no one named this before- (again with the inquisitive mind)
Most people teach women how to express themselves.
I spent my life understanding why they stopped.
That is why no one else could’ve connected these patterns in the same way I have.
What I’ve Been Watching for Two Decades
For over twenty years, I’ve watched what happens to a person’s real voice the moment it becomes public.
I saw it in performers who could step into character, belt out songs, command stages, and fill entire rooms with presence- yet shrink the moment they had to speak as themselves.
I saw it in business owners whose brilliance overflowed in private conversations, client work, and lived experience- but disappeared the second they tried to turn it into content.
I saw it in leadership spaces, studios, conferences, rehearsal rooms, brand rooms, client calls.
And eventually… I saw it in myself.
My originality didn’t disappear because I lacked confidence, clarity, or skill.
It collapsed because the moment self-expression turned inward, something fundamentally changed.
And no one was talking about why.
The Pattern Beneath the Pattern
For a long time, I believed my role was to help women build their voice.
But the deeper truth is this:
I wasn’t just noticing the pattern.
I was analysing it.
Tracking it.
Mapping it.
Studying it across identities, industries, environments, and decades.
This wasn’t something I learned from a course or a certification.
It was lived.
Originality wasn’t an ROI from an investment I made- it was forged in the moments that broke me and rebuilt me.
My mind doesn’t work in neat structures or pre-set frameworks.
In fact, it actively rebels against them.
It looks for:
behavioural patterns
identity fractures
root causes
creative collapse points
moments where expression compresses instead of expands
I wasn’t trying to be a theorist.
I just couldn’t stop studying what lived underneath everything.
Why This Theory Could Only Have Come Through Me
I thrive on innovation, not repetition.
And as I watched the online space grow louder, more templated, more performative — I felt something deeply wrong.
So much brilliance.
So much originality.
Compressed into fractions of who people really are.
The world didn’t need another way to teach expression.
It needed someone willing to explain why originality collapses in the first place.
When I zoomed out, the truth became impossible to ignore:
This theory didn’t come from one moment.
It came from twenty years of identity, expression, collapse, and rebuild.
From studios to stages.
From private conversations to public platforms.
From leadership roles to personal unravelling.
The Psychology of Originality was never something I decided to create.
It was something I finally recognised I had been preparing for my entire life.
This Is the Work
This entry isn’t here to prove anything.
It exists to mark a moment of recognition- the kind that only makes sense when you look back and realise the dots were always connected.
I’m not documenting content.
I’m documenting the birth of a field.
And this is only the beginning….
